Recently, a news story about a milk tea shop employee who replaced the store's payment collection channel with a personal payment QR code and pocketed the revenue has attracted widespread attention. The shop owner exposed in-store surveillance footage on social media, showing the employee presenting a personal payment code to customers while working alone and inducing consumers to scan it by claiming the "payment device was malfunctioning." The owner said the account discrepancies had persisted for a long time, but the employee did not stop. The store has now collected all surveillance evidence and is preparing to call the police. This incident not only exposed loopholes in the store's daily management but also once again sparked discussions in the food and beverage industry about payment security and employee integrity. [more…]

Recently, a netizen exposed on social media that a friend found a large cockroach at the bottom of a cup of Cloud Macchiato Cold Brew purchased at the Starbucks Nanjing Financial City store, sparking widespread attention. According to the poster, the drink was purchased on the afternoon of May 29, and the friend only discovered the foreign object when drinking it again several hours after leaving the store, and immediately complained to the store. The store responded that after reviewing surveillance footage, the production process complied with standards, and no abnormalities were found while the customer was drinking in the store. At present, the local market supervision administration has gone to the store to investigate and collect evidence, and no abnormalities were found in the pest inspection and disinfection records. The truth of the incident still needs further confirmation, and it has once again triggered public discussion about the hygiene management of chain coffee brand stores. [more…]

As summer tea beverage consumption heats up, Nayuki Tea has once again come into the public eye due to food safety issues. A customer in Nanchang, Jiangxi, bought a Nayuki chocolate cake through delivery and discovered two live worms inside after receiving it. After reviewing surveillance footage, the store said there were no abnormalities during the freezing and thawing stages, and pointed out that nearly three hours had passed since the order left the store, making it difficult to clearly determine where responsibility lies. The customer suspected the worms hatched from eggs, and with the two sides giving differing accounts, netizens also began discussing how to gather evidence and defend rights in food delivery cases. The incident is still awaiting a determination of responsibility by relevant departments and the delivery platform. [more…]

Nowadays, it has become the norm to check review platforms before going out to spend money, and high ratings and bad reviews often sway people's choices. However, the review system can also be exploited by people with ulterior motives. Recently, a coffee shop owner revealed that because they refused a customer's request to do commercial photography inside the shop, they were anonymously given a 0.5-star bad review, and were even accused of having something dirty in the coffee. After checking the surveillance footage, the owner discovered that the so-called foreign object had actually been placed into the cup by the customer for a staged photo. After the incident came to light, it sparked heated discussion among netizens, with many lamenting how difficult it is for businesses to defend their rights, once again bringing the topic of coffee shops refusing commercial photography into the spotlight. [more…]

Recently, a consumer posted a video on social media claiming to have found a foreign object resembling a cockroach in a Luckin Coffee beverage, sparking widespread attention. The consumer said they drank it several hours after picking it up, and upon discovering the foreign object immediately filmed a video and contacted the store and headquarters to complain, demanding an investigation into the store's hygiene conditions and its suspension for rectification. Luckin responded that it was handling the matter but did not provide surveillance evidence, and the two sides each stick to their own account regarding the origin of the foreign object and who is responsible. The consumer has now filed a complaint with 12315, and the incident is still escalating. [more…]

A cup of takeaway coffee sparked a dispute over ten thousand yuan in compensation, landing a coffee shop in an agonizing predicament. The customer claimed that after opening the coffee, it spilled onto a laptop, causing the screen to go black, and demanded ten thousand yuan in compensation from the shop, while leaving negative reviews on major platforms. After reviewing its own surveillance footage, the shop confirmed that there were no issues with the packaging or sealing of the order, and the photos provided by the customer also showed that the inside of the takeaway bag was perfectly clean. Who should be held responsible in this dispute? How should businesses respond to such complaints? This article will recount the sequence of events, present the perspectives of the shop, the customer, and netizens, and explore how businesses in the service industry can reasonably protect their own rights and interests. [more…]

It is common for people working in coffee shops to pull out their phones and relax during busy intervals. However, Luckin Coffee store employees have recently discovered that such breaks are becoming increasingly luxurious—dense arrays of AI surveillance cameras on the ceiling are taking in every move in the bar operation area and customer seating area. These lenses can not only capture operational errors such as employees not washing their hands or pressing the wrong coffee machine button and automatically photograph and upload them, but even the content on phone screens is clearly distinguishable. Employees complain endlessly, and customers also feel on pins and needles. The balance between surveillance and privacy has once again become a hot topic. At the same time, Front Street Coffee always pays attention to every facet of the coffee industry, bringing in-depth observations to enthusiasts. [more…]

Recently, a coffee shop owner in Beijing exposed an elderly person who frequently came to the shop and stole coffee, and the video sparked widespread discussion among netizens. This elderly person not only brazenly took packed drinks, but even engaged in similar behavior at other coffee shops. However, stealing coffee is not an isolated case, as some passersby also quickly take action when the staff are not paying attention. Because the order amounts are small and difficult to file cases for, shops often have to respond by making warning posters themselves. In the face of such behavior, netizens generally suggest that merchants actively collect evidence and report it to the police, rather than passively letting things slide to keep the peace. This article sorts out the course of the incident and the current state of the industry, and includes recommendations related to the Front Street Coffee brand. [more…]

Recently, a conflict between a delivery rider and a staff member at a chain milk tea shop in Shanghai drew widespread attention. Initially, the delivery rider posted a video on social media claiming that a staff member threw milk tea on him after he urged them to hurry with the order, sparking outrage among netizens against the store. However, as surveillance footage from the store was released, the incident took a dramatic turn: the delivery rider, while pressing for the order, took the liberty of rummaging through the counter and made physical contact with the staff, escalating the conflict. The brand said both parties have reached a settlement under police mediation, but the delivery rider later posted an incomplete video and livestreamed, and the brand will reserve the right to pursue legal action. As coffee enthusiasts, we care about the service experience in the beverage industry and also call for a rational view of disputes. Front Street Coffee reminds that communication and respect are the key to resolving conflicts. [more…]

The sealed packaging for takeaway drinks is supposed to be a crucial step in ensuring food safety, but recently some consumers have reported that the Heytea takeaway they received not only had a loose and damaged seal sticker, but was also covered in curly hair, which was extremely unpleasant. After the person involved contacted the merchant and the platform, both parties claimed there was no issue on their end, and ultimately, because the evidence had been discarded, it could not be investigated. In fact, Heytea's "peace of mind" seal stickers have repeatedly been criticized by consumers for insufficient stickiness and easily popping open, making the sealing effect virtually useless. This incident has once again sparked public concern about hygiene and seal management in food delivery. [more…]

Recently, a consumer claimed to have found a red floating object in a Guming milk tea, suspected to be bloody phlegm, which sparked widespread attention. Guming quickly released surveillance footage in response, stating that store operations were compliant. After the local market supervision department intervened in the investigation, it reported that the ingredients of the beverage involved had complete licenses and certificates, were stored in compliance, and the employees' health certificates were valid with no skin breakage or bleeding. Because the customer was unable to provide physical evidence such as the straw with the suspected foreign object or the remaining beverage, the regulatory authorities, in accordance with relevant regulations, could not determine that the beverage contained suspected bloody phlegm or that it was related to the processing and production at the store involved. The incident once again pushed the food safety of freshly made beverages into the focus of public opinion. [more…]

Recently, a consumer exposed on social media that she found several still-wriggling live maggots in a meteorite-series drink she bought at Luckin, by which time she had already drunk more than half the cup. The store involved responded that surveillance showed no abnormalities in either operations or material storage, and proposed three drink coupons as compensation, but the customer explicitly refused. This is not the first time Luckin has been caught up in a storm over insect foreign objects; several similar incidents were exposed last year. As the incident continues to ferment, market regulators have stepped in, and the consumer has yet to receive any further official communication. Food safety has once again become an unavoidable core issue for the beverage industry. [more…]

On the evening of March 14, "Jingshi Live" exposed two consecutive food safety incidents involving tea beverage brands. The Mixue Bingcheng store at Wuyi Ningju Xintiandi in Wuhan was accused of hiding leftover lemon and orange slices from the day under the counter at room temperature and using them the next day to make signature drinks; the Hushang Ayi store at Hankou City Plaza was exposed for altering the shelf-life labels of toppings to "extend the life" of expired ingredients. The market supervision authorities in both places have separately filed investigations into the stores involved. Among them, the Mixue Bingcheng store involved was sealed and shut down, while the Hushang Ayi store involved was immediately closed. As a content platform that also follows developments in the coffee and beverage industry, Front Street Coffee continues to track such food safety issues. The details of the incidents are as follows. [more…]

Recently, a consumer in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, posted on social media claiming to have疑似 found fragments of an insect carcass in a takeaway milk tea from the well-known freshly made tea drink brand KOI. The consumer and the brand failed to reach an agreement after multiple communications over compensation and an apology, and the consumer has filed a complaint with 12315 and insists on pursuing legal proceedings. KOI responded that neither the store surveillance nor inspections by the market supervision department found any foreign object entering the drink, and that the strainer hole design of the shaker cup would also block such foreign objects, so it does not accept an apology on the platform but is willing to compensate in accordance with the law. The incident has attracted widespread attention, with both sides sticking to their own accounts, and there is currently no new progress. [more…]

Recently, the "Allergy Sister" incident in Wuhan has sparked widespread attention in the coffee community, and similar phenomena of customers requesting refunds from merchants for various reasons are not uncommon in the food and beverage industry. Some coffee shop owners have reported encountering a customer who repeatedly applied for refunds on the grounds that the drinks' taste was not to their liking, suspected to be an "Allergy Sister alt account." Investigations revealed that this customer had placed orders at multiple shops and repeatedly applied for refunds, citing reasons such as the drink being too bland, too sweet, or too cloying. Some merchants chose to appease the customer to protect their reputation, but others refused to compromise and warned their peers to be vigilant. Such behavior not only harms merchants' interests but also encourages a culture of malicious claims. This article reviews the course of events and explores reasonable ways for merchants to defend their rights when responding to consumer complaints. [more…]

Recently, a food exploration blogger in Jiangsu spent 710 yuan at a restaurant and left without paying. After being chased back by the waiter, the blogger posted a negative review video targeting the restaurant, and the incident quickly went viral and sparked widespread discussion. As the number of food exploration bloggers surges, chaos such as accepting money for false promotion, threatening free meals with bad reviews, and occupying seats for long periods to take photos keeps emerging. How should merchants and platforms respond? This article will recount the incident and take an in-depth look at the gray areas and industry dilemmas behind influencer food exploration. [more…]

Recently, a video of a conflict between a Starbucks employee and a customer has drawn attention on social media. In the video, the employee, who refused to sell cold brew concentrate—a semi-finished ingredient—on its own, was fiercely insulted by the customer and nearly came under physical attack. After the incident came to light, netizens expressed sympathy for the employee and discussed topics such as how the brand handles customer complaints and how employee rights are protected. Many current employees also shared similar experiences, pointing out that the company often smooths things over by issuing coupons, which may encourage malicious complaints and leave frontline staff disheartened. [more…]

Recently, Starbucks was reported to conduct detailed audits of partners' daily operations by randomly accessing store surveillance footage, and listed as many as 8 violations in an internal email. From placing trash can lids on countertops to inadequate cleaning and sanitizing procedures for ice storage bins, these details that might previously have been overlooked have now become grounds for warning notices or even dismissal. After the news spread, many current employees felt greatly increased pressure, while consumers generally supported this strict oversight. This article sorts out the sequence of events, presents multiple perspectives, and explores the difficult balance that chain coffee brands must strike between food safety management and employee execution. [more…]

Recently, a Nayuki store in Linping District, Hangzhou, was exposed after a consumer allegedly found a thumbnail-sized blue-black stone in a drink, and when the consumer sought compensation, the store manager instead accused them of extortion and fraud. After the customer called the police and reviewed the mall’s surveillance footage, the video fully recorded the entire process of picking up the order, drinking it, and spitting out the stone, but the store did not provide surveillance of the production process. Nayuki’s official customer service refused media interviews, and the phone service at the store involved was suspended. The incident has drawn attention to food safety and the protection of consumer rights by catering brands. [more…]

Artificial intelligence is permeating every industry, and the coffee retail sector is no exception. Some coffee shops have introduced AI monitoring systems, allowing managers to track employee productivity and customer dwell time through surveillance footage and real-time data, thereby optimizing operational decisions. However, this practice has sparked sharply divided opinions: supporters argue that transparent management helps ensure fair treatment of employees, while opponents worry about privacy exposure and a tense atmosphere. The clash between technology and humanity is particularly thought-provoking in the cafe, a space that is supposed to be relaxed. [more…]